Stage 1 (Stari trg near Slovenj Gradec)

Interactive drawing

Technical analysis

Pigments: white lime (calcite), yellow earth (goethite), red earth (haematite), azurite, green pigment (unidentified), lead pigment (unidentified)

Analytical techniques: OM, Raman

The work in question is a mural that has been taken down and transferred onto a canvas base. Underneath, an approximately 3 mm thick plaster made of lime and sand has been preserved, which is clearly visible on the lower edge of the lunette. The cross-sections reveal a bright plaster (figg. 1–2). It is likely that quartz or crushed limestone was mostly used as the aggregate. In some places, pinkish plaster is visible. However, this is possibly not the original plaster but could have been added during restoration works (fig. 3).

The colour palette includes white, yellow, red, blue, green, and black. The pigments are mainly natural and inorganic: white lime, yellow (goethite), and red (haematite) earth (fig. 2). Apart from these, the analyses have confirmed the use of azurite, which is already recognisable in the cross-sections from the characteristic angular grains of the crushed mineral (fig. 1). The sample of the green colour did not yield a final result, as the cross-section does not show green but rather a dark red, almost brown colour (fig. 2). It may be a red underpainting under the malachite, which has fallen off the sample. There are a few darkened, black areas, for example on Mary’s face (fig. 4), suggesting the use of a sort of lead pigment that has darkened due to chemical reactions with the atmosphere. It was not possible to take a sample from this area.

The painting technique is unclear. The thick layers of colour peeling off the plaster and the white edges that can be seen underneath in some places suggest the lime technique. The samples also reveal a thin white layer below the layers of colour, but this may be a part of the very top of the plaster (figs. 1–2). As the samples are extremely tiny, the presence of limewash could not be confirmed. Perhaps we are only dealing with unusually thick colour layers. The primary binder is lime, though an organic binder (egg tempera, animal glue or casein) may have been added to some of the pigments.

The painter used thin, shallow, and barely noticeable incisions for the parallel coloured lines of the upper bordure. He outlined the halos in the same manner and designed them using a double parallel line. A pink underdrawing, particularly visible on Mary’s face (fig. 4), was used to outline the figures. The painter’s strokes are quick and decisive, as can be seen in the drapery of the figure on the left. The colour layers are too poorly preserved to distinguish potential underpaintings. None have been revealed by the cross-sections, nor are they noticeable under the azurite. The painter mainly used local primary colours. The layers are thick and peeling away. This is obvious on Mary’s face, where the underlying greenish colour layer (verdaccio?) clearly covers the underdrawing, which also features remnants of a yellowish carnation. The blackened areas of the eyes and cheeks coincide with potential white highlights (darkened lead white?). Thick layers of colour over the underdrawing can also be seen on Jesus’ feet. The faces are elongated and feature high semicircular eyebrows. Mary has a straight, long nose that continues with a line from both eyebrows, while Jesus has a shorter and more potato-shaped nose, drawn – at least on the preserved underdrawing – with a line proceeding from the inner eyebrow (fig. 4). The long-fingered hands look elegant, at least in their basic outlines. However, the modelling has not been preserved, and the legs are rather clumsy. The draperies are basically drawn with lines for the folds, but Jesus’ clothes suggest that the painter also modelled the folds with shades and highlights. He drew the final contours with a broad reddish-brown outline.

Gallery

Virtual 360° view

Stari trg near Slovenj Gradec, Parish church of St Pancras, Stage 1 (Stari trg near Slovenj Gradec), 2024 (last updated 29. 8. 2024). Corpus picturarum muralium medii aevi, https://corpuspicturarum.zrc-sazu.si/en/poslikava/phase-1-church-of-st-pancras-stari-trg-pri-slovenj-gradcu/ (11. 9. 2026).

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

prediction market

binance prediction

indodax prediction

bybit prediction

bitget prediction

okx prediction

tokocrypto prediction

metamask prediction

pintu prediction

kraken prediction

xe prediction

kucoin prediction

bitmart prediction

lbank prediction

coinex prediction

bingx prediction

bitcompare prediction

huobi prediction

xt prediction

luno prediction

bitfinex prediction

bitrue prediction

upbit prediction

zipmex prediction

bitpanda prediction

safepal prediction

bitstamp prediction

bittrex prediction

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

Polynion

geminiscore